Enbee Education Centre Private Limited Vs Commissioner of C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-I (CESTAT Ahmedabad) The services provided amount to “export of service” under Rule 2 read with Rule 3(2) of the Place of Provision of Service Rules We share the recent order passed by the Hon’ble CESTAT Ahmedabad. The appellant is providing services to foreign universities. […]
CESTAT Mumbai rules extended limitation cannot apply for service tax demand on sub-contractors due to conflicting decisions, emphasizing procedural norms.
DRAT Mumbai dismissed Bank of Maharashtra’s appeal, ruling the payment wasn’t made under reserve, with no fault attributed to the exporter.
Bombay HC directs processing of refund claims and accountability for delayed GST refunds from 2014, with interest and action against officials.
Classification cannot be changed merely because 8 digit classification has been introduced, CESTAT sets aside demand of differential duty along with penalties
CESTAT Mumbai set aside CENVAT Credit denial for Mangal Singh Bros., ruling that duty acceptance on final products justifies credit claim.
Bombay High Court ruled on a GST refund case, confirming no interest due on excess ITC reversal under retrospective Section 50 amendment.
Kohler India appeals for CENVAT credit denial on input services for factory construction. CESTAT directs fresh order within 2 months for proper consideration.
Bombay HC quashes GST order blocking Bhansali Industries’ credit ledger. Case remanded for fresh adjudication with proper reasoning and a fair hearing.
BPCL challenges the Central Excise classification of propylene, seeking relief against the differential duty imposed by the authorities.
