CESTAT Chandigarh quashes allegations of clandestine removal of chemicals without excise duty payment, emphasizing the importance of expert evidence.
CESTAT Kolkata rules that objections on the eligibility of credit cannot be raised when filing refund claims, providing relief to Infosys Technologies Ltd.
Explore the case of Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd vs DCIT, where a missing Document Identification Number (DIN) led to the invalidation of an income tax assessment order
CESTAT Mumbai remands the matter in the Sunder’s International vs. Commissioner of Customs case, questioning piecemeal adjudication and MRP determination.
CESTAT Chandigarh rules on service tax demands based on ST-3 Returns and balance sheets in the case of Indian Machine Tools Manufacturers Association vs. Commissioner of Central Excise.
The ruling emphasized that limitation should not apply in such cases and that the mere filing of an appeal by the department does not withhold the refund.
Explore CESTAT Chandigarh order on Hero Motocorp Ltd vs. CCE & ST Gurugram, where entire demand is deemed unlawful. Detailed analysis and conclusion provided.
In the case of The Advertising Corporation of India Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Service Tax, CESTAT Kolkata rules on service tax liability and exemptions. Learn the detailed analysis and outcome.
Learn why Kerala High Court rules that the District Collector cannot grant sales tax dues instalments and directs the petitioner to approach the STO. Detailed analysis provided.
Explore Delhi High Court’s judgment in CIT vs. Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd. regarding significance of DIN in income tax communication. Understand implications of 2019 CBDT Circular.
