The CESTAT in Chennai ruled in favor of the department, classifying Samsung Galaxy Tabs as ADP Machines/Tablet Computers rather than Mobile Phones, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) prior decision.
In the case of Vikash Marda Vs Union Of India, the Calcutta High Court instructs CIT(A) to expedite pending appeals concerning assessments made under the Black Money Act.
In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that a less than a day delay in the expiry of an E-way bill due to reasons beyond control is excusable, setting aside penalties in the case of Ashok Mishra Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.
CCI dismisses anti-profiteering case against JKG Construction Pvt. Ltd., confirming no additional projects beyond JKG Palm Court were executed.
The tribunal observed that the liability to pay the Customs Duty had crystallized during the relevant year, as the company could not fulfill its export obligation. Therefore, the deduction of the Customs Duty was allowable in the same year. The ITAT Chennai cited Section 43B of the Income Tax Act, which allows deductions for statutory dues in the year of payment, irrespective of the accounting method followed by the assessee.
Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs has issued Notification No. 55/2023-Customs (N.T.) on 21st July, 2023. This notification brings a significant amendment to the Customs Act, 1962, with particular relevance to the State of Maharashtra. MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) […]
In the recent case of Sandhya Agarwal Vs ACIT, ITAT Kolkata orders re-adjudication due to a mismatch between contract receipts in Form 26AS and Income Tax Return.
Explore the intricate details and implications of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in the ITO vs Mayur R. Kamdar case. Delve into the tax implications of alleged bogus purchases and understand how this landmark case has unfolded.
Detailed analysis of the CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling on the Goodluck Empire Vs CCE & ST case involving penalties under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.
The CESTAT Chandigarh has ruled in favor of Mankoo Machine Tools in a pivotal case on SSI exemptions. This decision clarifies that family surnames can be used across separate entities without forfeiting SSI exemptions.
