ITAT Delhi, in the ACIT Vs TV Today Network Ltd case, ruled that no penalty for failure to deduct TDS is applicable if the assessee added back the expense on which the tax was not deducted.
Calcutta High Court allows writ petition in the case of L.G. Balakrishnan & Bros Limited Vs ACIT, setting aside an earlier rejection of appeal due to a delay of 148 days. The court sets a cost of Rs. 40,000/- to be paid to WBGST Authority.
Delve into the case of Santi Kumar Oswal Vs ACIT where ITAT Kolkata ruled that no disallowance can be made for GST paid before the due date of filing ROI, emphasizing fair application of the Income Tax Act.
A last-minute application to stay LOCs for international travel met with strong disapproval and a fine from the Bombay High Court, reinforcing the importance of timely applications to court.
Read the analysis of the ITAT Kolkata order in the case of Asha Vijay Vs ITO regarding the inapplicability of Section 56(2)(vii)(b) to transfers that took place before the accounting year 2014-15. Learn how the ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition made under Section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Explore the recent verdict by ITAT Delhi in the case of ACIT Vs Capricorn Identity Services P Ltd, where it supported the deletion of disallowance and acknowledged the revenue expenditure of business activities.
Detailed review of the Satya Dharma Hotels Pvt Ltd vs ITO case, where the ITAT Delhi has directed a re-adjudication due to the AO not considering Section 55A of the Income Tax Act.
An exploration of the CESTAT Ahmedabad’s dismissal of the Revenue’s appeal in the case of Commissioner of Central Excise & ST Vs Galaxy Diesel, focusing on the demand for exempted service despite Cenvat Credit repayment.
Detailed analysis of Delhi High Court’s decision in Home Credit India B.V. Vs ACIT, focusing on the quashing of a reassessment notice due to lack of clarity in its recipient.
An examination of the ITAT Delhi’s decision in the SVP Industries Ltd. Vs DCIT case, ruling that the COVID-19 pandemic period should not be included in the limitation period for appeal filing.
