In re Garware Industries Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Whether as per Notification no. 20/2019 dated 30/09/2019, services provided by Garware industries Limited falls under clause (id) Heading 9988. Answer:- The Impugned services provided by applicant falls under clause (id) Heading 9988. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA PROCEEDINGS (Under […]
In re Fine Electro Coating (GST AAR Maharashtra) Since no new product comes into existence after the process conducted by the applicant on the goods supplied by its principals, therefore the process undertaken will come under the purview of jobwork as defined under Section 2 (68) of the GST Act, 2017. Thus, in view of […]
In re Mumbai Port Trust (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question. Whether in law and in facts and circumstances of the case, the Applicant (MbPT) is entitled to exemption from payment of GST in terms of Entry No.3 of the Notification No. 12/2012-CTR dtd.20-06-2012 on the following considerations payable to it by Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority […]
An RTI reveals that Whopping 6.14 lac crore ITC blocked under rule 86A of CGST Rules, 2017 out of which 2.96 lac Crore is blocked for more then 1 year in utter disregard of rule 86A(3). Clarification by GSTN (@Infosys_GSTN) on 13.10.2021 on Twitter In social media, a figure of Rs. 6.14 Lakh Crore of […]
The Calcutta High court in this case was considering the writ petition where the petitioner contended that the assessment was made in disregard of the violation of natural justice as the password for the Video Conferencing was not provided and relevant evidence was produced.
Monopoly Innovations Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India & Ors. (Bombay High Court) 1. The petitioner is a private limited company duly registered under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is a registered unit under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprise Development Act, 2006 and, inter alia, engaged in the business of production […]
National Building Construction Corporation Ltd. Vs Add. CIT (ITAT Delhi) In the instant case before us also, the expenses have been incurred on the direction of the relevant Ministry / Government of India. Further, neither the Assessing Officer nor the learned DR has rebutted the contention of the assessee that expenses have been incurred for […]
It is quite clear that to recommend abolition of audit for certain companies is not covered u/s 132(2) and therefore not within the scope of NFRA. So, any recommendation by NFRA to abolish of audit for certain companies is ultra-virus. NFRA should not have included this aspect in its Consultation paper at all.
Mumbai South CGST Commissionerate detected a fake ITC case of about Rs. 270 crores relating to diamonds, whether or not worked but not mounted or set. Mumbai GST zone has appreciably stepped up its all-round anti-evasion work.
Union of India and 4 Ors. Vs Keshari Industries (Gauhati High Court) Order passed following the Supreme Court decision cannot be termed as erroneous simply because subsequently the said decision of the Supreme Court is held to be per incurium by a larger bench FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GAUHATI HIGH COURT All these […]
