SAP India Pvt. Limited Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Bangalore) By the impugned orders in the above appeals, the respondent has confirmed the demand of service tax on the licence fee paid to SAP AG, Germany, for grant of non-exclusive licence to use, market and sublicense the software, third party database and third-party software […]
In re Amogh Ramesh Bhatawadekar (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question. I) Whether ‘e-goods’ as commercially known in the market are ‘goods’ as defined in the GST Acts or are they services as per GST Act? Answer: – E-goods, in this case- ‘Online Gaming’ will be covered under services under the GST Act. Question. 2) If they […]
The DC finds that an order has been passed against Mr. Manudhane on 1st December, 2020 by the Disciplinary Committee of IPA for accepting assignment as Resolution Professional after 31st December, 2019 without holding a valid AFA in the CIRP of the CD and it has been decided that Mr. Manudhane is guilty of Professional […]
The MSME sector is an important pillar of Indian economy as it contributes greatly to growth of Indian economy with a vast network of around 30 million units, creating employment of about 70 million, manufacturing more than 6000 products, contributing about 45% to manufacturing output and about 40% of exports, directly and indirectly.
Awadkrupa Plastomech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) It appears from the materials on record that the writ applicant wants the respondent authorities to sanction the refund of Integrated Goods and Service Tax [herein after referred to as the ‘IGST’] paid in respect of the goods exported i.e. ‘Zero Rated Supplies’ vide […]
On the anti-evasion front, DGGI formations and the CGST zones have continued their drive against fake invoice usage. They have, so far in the month-long operation. unearthed 4689 fake GSTINs and arrested 141 persons and booked cases involving wrongly availed credit of Rs.13447.95 crore.
Katta Subramaniam Naidu Vs Deputy Director (Karnataka High Court) In this batch of petitions, petitioners have questioned the correctness and legality of the proceedings initiated against them under sections 3, 4 and 8(5) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short ‘PML Act’). 2. The common grievance of the petitioners is that they […]
Sahibabad Printers Vs Additional Commissioner CGST (Appeals) And Others (Allahabad High Court) Counsel for the petitioner argues that as the show cause notice was silent, the petitioner could not have been expected to give any reply and further questioning the appellate order he argues that the appellate authority was wrong in recording that no document […]
In the present matter, Mr. Guddeti was appointed as IRP by National Company Law Tribunal, Delhi Bench, Court – IV (AA) vide order dated 4th February 2020 initiating CIRP of CD on application under section 7 of the Code by M/s Amritvani Exim Private Limited claiming to be financial creditor and public announcement was made […]
Toyoda Micromatic Machinery India Private Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) It is a fact that the learned assessing officer has not challenged the order of the learned CIT – A stating that resale price method is the most appropriate method as assessee does not engage in any deemed manufacturing or further value addition. It is […]
