Regarding non- availability of LLP Version 3 of the MCA- 21 Portal and Company e-Filings on V2 portal for 9 forms from 27th Aug (12:00AM) to 28th Aug (11:59PM).
Eversub India Private limited Vs Union of India & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Summons under circulars dated 23.12.2019, 26.02.2007 and 20.01.2015, and the guidelines incorporated in the circular dated 05.11.2019 have to be issued as a last resort; the contention being that if information can be obtained from officers working for an entity, then the top […]
If TDS credit is disallowed than corresponding income offered by assessee for taxation also ought to have been reduced by passing rectification order u/s 154 by AO
Assessee has not received advisory notice issued u/s 285 BA (5) and the show cause notice of penalty u/s 271FA due to change of mail id and further contended that, the delay in filing the return was not deliberate.
In the event of death of Karta of HUF, the name of the deceased Karta in the Beneficial Owner (BO) account shall be replaced by the new Karta of the HUF who in such a case shall be eldest coparcener in the HUF or a coparcener who is appointed as Karta by an agreement reached amongst all the coparceners of the HUF
Read our blog to learn what are ULIPs how to maximise your ULIP returns and the Advantages of Investing in ULIPs.
Representation to CBDT on information sought from Tax Auditors under Clause 44 of Form 3CD and request to abolish this requirement
In re Zigma Global Environ Solutions Private Ltd (GST AAR Kerala) Question 1: Classification of the services i.e., ‘Bio-mining and scientific closure of legacy wastes at the dumpsite in Kureepuzha, Kollam’ to be provided by the Applicant to the Superintending Engineer, Kollam Municipal Corporation. Ruling: The above services are classifiable under SAC 9994 as per […]
Assessee cannot be permitted to adopt a modus operandi and giving an accounting treatment to GST without passing through profit and loss account to circumvent provisions of section 43B
D. Ravinder Reddy Vs Smt. C. Geethanjali (Telangana High Court) In the present case, there is no dispute that the parties by incorporating Clause 28 had agreed to resolve their disputes through arbitration. The said clause is extracted below: “In the case of any dispute between the parties hereto touching these presents, the matter shall […]
