Follow Us:

Section 54: Prior to amendment on 1-4-2015 no restriction on number of residential property

May 14, 2018 4512 Views 1 comment Print

As Prior to assessment year 2015-16 no restriction was placed by the legislature in respect of investments in the residential houses that an assessee could make for claiming deduction under section 54 of the Act. We thus are of the view that the claim of deduction raised by the assessee under section 54 in respect of investment made towards purchase of residential house at Mumbai and Pune was well in order.

On bogus purchases reasonable GP rate would be applied and added to assessee’s income, and not entire bogus purchases

May 14, 2018 3354 Views 0 comment Print

New Consolidated Construction Company Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessee conceded that to buy peace of mind he was ready to accept the percentage as consistently applied by the Tribunal in other cases. When a query was put to the revenue he also fairly agreed for a reasonable percentage. ITAT held that Profit rate […]

Conditional exemption from E-Way Bill in Kerala for Intra-State Goods Movement

May 14, 2018 8052 Views 1 comment Print

Kerala Government exempts movement of All goods within the state Irrespective of value from E-Way Bill requirement if i. supply of such goods should be by a registered person using a sales van. ii. the documents prescribed under Rule 56(18) should be carried in the sales van.

Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018

May 14, 2018 22200 Views 4 comments Print

(1) These regulations may be called the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2018. (2) They shall come into force on the date of publication in the Official Gazette. (3) These regulations shall apply to, a Customs Broker who has been licensed and such other persons who have been employed or engaged by a licensed Customs Broker under these regulations or the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 1984 or the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 or the Customs Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013.

Important amendments in Appendices issued under FTP, 2015-20

May 14, 2018 1611 Views 0 comment Print

(i) Now Advance Authorization for Annual Requirement can also can be issued where Ad hoc norms exist for the resultant product. (ii) Enabling provision is made to submit manual BRCs and self attested copy of Exporter Copy of shipping bill. (iii) Other amendments made to bring clarity and harmonise documentation requirements for EODC.

Inclusion of GIA, Israel and GIA, Japan as authorized laboratories for certification/ grading of diamonds of 0.25 carat and above

May 14, 2018 483 Views 0 comment Print

Gemological Institute of America, Israel and Gemological Institute of America, Japan are included in paragraph 4.74 of Handbook of Procedures (2015-20) for certification/ grading of diamonds of 0.25 carat and above.

Submit complete documents as provided in Appendix 4E for cases relating to NC-4: DGFT

May 14, 2018 2463 Views 0 comment Print

Non-submission of complete Appendix 4E, containing technical details, chemical reactions and data sheet for advance authorisation applications on self declaration basis under Para 4.04 and 4.07 of HBP for cases relating to NC-4.

Notification No. 4/2018-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI), Dated: 14.05.2018

May 14, 2018 933 Views 0 comment Print

Notification No. 4/2018-Customs (N.T./CAA/DRI)S.O. (E). – In pursuance of notification No. 60/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 453(E), dated 4th June 2015 in Gazette of India, Extra-ordinary, Part-II, section 3, sub-section (i), and as amended by notification No. 133/2015-Customs (N.T.), published vide number G.S.R. 916(E) dated 30th November 2015 in Gazette of India, Extra-ordinary, Part-II, section 3

GST appeal should not be dismissed for delay if No Appellate Authority constituted

May 14, 2018 2148 Views 0 comment Print

As petitioner could not file appeal earlier because of non-constitution of the Appellate Authority, which has now been appointed vide notification dated April 19, 2018, the appeal filed by the appellant shall not be dismissed only on account of delay.

Re-Assessment notice after 4 years without Approval of CIT or CCIT is Invalid: Delhi HC

May 13, 2018 2070 Views 0 comment Print

1. Whether ITAT was correct in law in holding that the notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 148 of the Act beyond the 04 years after the end of relevant assessment year was bad in law as the necessary approval of Chief Commissioner or Commissioner of Income Tax as per the provisions of Section 151 (1) of the Act had not been obtained by the Assessing Officer

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930