An in-depth examination of the recent ITAT Ahmedabad verdict in the DCIT vs. Shiv Build case. The ruling highlights that no disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) can be made for the short deduction of tax, creating a precedent for future cases.
Analysis of the recent ITAT Mumbai judgment concerning Secunderabad Healthcare Ltd Vs CIT, focusing on the inclusion of commission earned from accommodation entry in the total income of the assessee.
An examination of the Madras High Courts dismissal of the Saravana Groups writ petition challenging tax demand notices for multiple years on technical grounds.
A detailed analysis of the recent ITAT Bangalore ruling in Anaveer Proprietor Vs ITO. The matter has been restored for reconsideration of the source of cash deposits during demonetization linked with LPG cylinder sales.
The Delhi bench of ITAT rules against Gopi Mani Kuttan on delayed deposit of employee contributions to PF/ESIC, in compliance with income tax laws. The article explores the verdict in detail and provides an analysis of the implications of the ruling.
Delhi High Court has set aside the assessment order issued against Dauphin Travel Marketing Private Limited. The main bone of contention was the inadequate response time given to the company to answer a show-cause notice, resulting in a breach of the principles of natural justice.
In the case of N.B. Builders & Promoters (P) Ltd Vs CIT, ITAT Chandigarh held that penalties cannot be imposed for mere lower gross profit based on assumptions and conjectures.
ITAT noted that Interest income was earned on NSC, fixed deposit/certificate of bank as a result of a mandatory business requirement as per the West Bengal Cooperative Societies Act. Therefore, the interest earned from these deposits was indeed a business income, making it eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i).
ITAT Delhi in Manveer Singh Vs ITO case emphasised requirement of obtaining bank statement before issuing a reassessment notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act on alleged cash deposits based on AIR information even, leading to deletion of income tax addition.
A ruling from the CESTAT Chennai holds that the manufacture of non-marketable sugar syrup is not subject to excise duty, setting a new precedent in tax law.
