ITAT Mumbai held that re-assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act not sustainable as assessee duly provided full and true material facts necessary for the assessment.
ITAT Mumbai held that the assessment made u/s 153C of the Income Tax Act beyond the six assessment year is without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
ITAT Mumbai held that TDS not deductible by Uber India in respect of payment made to driver partners on behalf of Uber BV for the transportation services.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that motor vehicles qualify as self-propelled vehicles and accordingly depreciation at the rate of 33.40% available on the same.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that post non-service of notice, revenue failed to carry out its primary responsibility to ascertain whether the company, against which notices were issued, and proceedings under section 148 was contemplated, was existing or not. Accordingly, matter remanded to carry out fresh adjudication.
ITAT Mumbai held that once whole income i.e. LTCG from sale of joint property purchased is brought to tax in the hands of assessee’s wife and claim is granted by the Coordinate bench, the same income cannot be taxed in the hands of the assessee.
ITAT Hyderabad held that order passed without giving reasons for the conclusions arrived at is a non-speaking order and the same is liable to be set aside.
ITAT Delhi held that reopening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on mistaken factual premise is unsustainable in law.
Original Application filed by the Respondent No.1 as the same could be heard only by the Division Bench and not by the Learned Single Member of the Tribunal. Accordingly, decision of Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal revoking deputation of the sales tax officer lacks jurisdiction.
Bombay High Court directed that the Application filed by a Secured creditor under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act should be disposed of by the District Magistrate/ Collector in the State of Maharashtra not later than 30 days.
