Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Alakapuri Sai Mandiram Trust Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Alakapuri Sai Mandiram Trust Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) The Trust filed an appeal before the CIT(A) 1,817 days late against a 143(1) intimation. CIT(A) refused to condone the delay because the Trust did not provide any reasonable or sufficient cause for such an extraordinary lapse. Before the ITAT, the Trust again could not demonstrate any justifiable reason for the huge delay. The Tribunal held that condonation under Section 249(3) is a discretionary power, exercisable only when a genuine cause is shown. Here, no explanation whatsoever had been provided either before CIT(A) or before ITAT. Since...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930