Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot) The assessee, an NRI based in the USA, faced addition of ₹78.69 lakh as unexplained investment u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE for purchase of an Ahmedabad flat. The AO rejected explanations of foreign savings, parental contribution & housing loan, citing insufficient evidence. The DRP dismissed assessee’s objections solely due to a one-day delay & non-filing of Form 35A. ITAT observed that such a minor delay should not defeat substantive justice & that the assessee was denied proper opportunity both before AO & DRP. Citing principl...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930