Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vineet Prakash Bansal HUF Moh. Khatiyan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vineet Prakash Bansal HUF Moh. Khatiyan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Mechanical Approval Vitiates Assessment: ITAT Quashes Sec. 153C Order for Invalid Sec. 153D Sanction; Search Assessment Annulled: Single, Template-Style Approval Violates Sec. 153D Mandate; Jurisdictional Flaw: ITAT Confirms Mechanical Sec. 153D Sanction Renders 153C Assessment Null and Void Delhi Tribunal   quashed the assessment framed u/s 153C, holding that the approval granted u/s 153D was mechanical, perfunctory & invalid, thereby vitiating the entire assessment. The case arose from a search u/s 132 on 10.08.2018 at the pre...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Patna ITAT: Interest on Delayed Payment of Sales Tax, Service Tax & Employer’s PF Contribution Allowable; TDS Interest Not Deductible Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031