Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ajit Pal Singh Choudhary Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ajit Pal Singh Choudhary Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Quashes Reassessment for Invalid Sanction Beyond 3 Years- Reopening Beyond Three Years with Wrong Approval—ITAT Quashes Bogus LTCG Reassessment Assessee declared ₹10.56 lakh income and claimed exempt LTCG of ₹1.10 crore. AO reopened the case alleging bogus LTCG from penny stock and added ₹1,09,89,382 u/s 69A. CIT(A) upheld the addition. Before ITAT, Assessee argued that the notice u/s 148 was issued on 19.07.2022, i.e., beyond 3 years from AY 2016-17, so Section 151(ii) required approval of Principal Chief Commissioner / Principal DG, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031