Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tekchand Punjabi Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tekchand Punjabi Vs ITO (ITAT Raipur) AO noticed cash deposits of ₹1,15,000 on 22.06.2015 &  ₹4,00,000 on 25.06.2015 in Assessee’s SBI account. Assessee explained that ₹5,00,000 was withdrawn on 12.06.2015 via bearer cheque issued to employee Shri Prem Shankar Mishra, which was later re-deposited as not required. AO rejected the explanation, stating that such bearer cheque transaction had never been done earlier &  termed it a colourable device, making addition of ₹4,00,000 u/s 69A. Regarding ₹1,15,000 deposit, AO allowed opening cash of ₹93,126 &  added the balanc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930