Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ankush Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Ankush Kumar Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) Statement Alone Cannot Tax ₹9.70 Crore: ITAT Jaipur Deletes Protective Addition for Lack of Corroborative Evidence Jaipur Bench of the ITAT dealt with a case where AO made a protective addition of ₹9.70 crore on the allegation that Assessee had paid this amount in cash to one Shri Mohit Garg for purchase of gold. The foundation of the addition was only the statement of Mohit Garg recorded u/s 132(4) during search, in which he stated that he received the money from “Ankush Kumar Jain” & also mentioned a PAN number that matched the assessee’s ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031