Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suthakar Selvaraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suthakar Selvaraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) No Addition Can Be Made on Mere Presumption About Withdrawal Habits- ITAT Bangalore Deletes Addition on Cash Deposits – Withdrawals from Same Bank Account Accepted- Salaried Employee’s Bank Withdrawals Accepted as Source of Deposits– Assessee’s Cash Flow Statement Accepted Assessee, an employee of BEML Ltd, filed return declaring income of ₹5,78,420. AO noted mismatch between salary TDS & return income, & also found cash deposits of ₹10,70,600 in Canara Bank. Assessee explained that ₹5 lakhs came from property sale & the balan...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930