Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kadalur Ramakrishna Mahesha Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kadalur Ramakrishna Mahesha Vs PCIT (ITAT Bangalore) AO’s 6% Profit Estimation Upheld -Difference of Opinion on Estimation Not Enough – Bang Trib Tribunal Rejects 263 Revision- PCIT Cannot Substitute His View for AO’s – ITAT Applies SC Rulings on 263 Assessee is a civil contractor & did the contract works to the various Govt. agencies & received the payment through the Banking channels. The Government deducted the TDS amount u/s. 194C which was also duly reflected in Form 26AS. Assessee filed his return of income in Form ITR 2 even though his income comprises of business income...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031