Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kiran Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kiran Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi Quashes Reassessment– Wrong Authority’s Approval Invalidates 148 Notice- Rs.2.25 Cr LTCG Addition Deleted as 148 Notice Found Invalid Assessee filed appeal against order of CIT(A) which had upheld reassessment framed u/s 147/144B. There was a delay of 11 days in filing appeal, explained as order was served only on old email ID of disengaged counsel. Tribunal condoned the delay, holding that it was bona fide. The case originated from notice u/s 148 issued on 30.07.2022 after order u/s 148A(d). AO added Rs.2,25,71,243/- as unexplained money u/s 69A treati...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031