Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manuraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manuraj Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) ITAT Bangalore Condones Delay of 126 Days – Senior Citizen Given Fresh Chance in Property Transaction Case The appeal arose out of an ex-parte order of NFAC, Delhi, dated 30.12.2024. The assessment was completed u/s 144 as the Assessee did not respond to statutory notices. AO treated the transaction relating to immovable property effected during the year as unexplained. On appeal, CIT(A) also passed an ex-parte order since the Assessee remained unrepresented. Before the Tribunal, Assessee explained that she is a senior citizen who had been depending upon her s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930