Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Landmark Property Development Co Ltd Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Landmark Property Development Co Ltd Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court) System Glitch No Excuse- Refund Cannot Be Blocked by CPC Limitations -Advance Tax Credit Must Be Given- Delhi HC Directs Manual Refund in Demerger Case – The Delhi High Court addressed a writ petition concerning the grant of credit for advance tax paid by a predecessor entity in the context of a corporate demerger. The petitioner argued that part of the advance tax deposited in the PAN of the predecessor ought to be credited to the demerged company, but due to system limitations at CPC, such adjustment was not being reflected, r...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930