Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ambai Gramin Bigarsheti Sah Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ambai Gramin Bigarsheti Sah Pat Sanstha Maryadit Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Tribunal: Section 249(4)(b) Cannot Bar Appeal When No Advance Tax Payable – Assessee Gets Another Chance Pune Tribunal has held that dismissal of appeal u/s 249(4)(b) is not justified where the assessee had no tax liability in the preceding year. Tribunal remanded the issue of addition u/s 69A to AO for fresh adjudication. Assessee, a cooperative society, did not file its return of income. AO, in best judgment assessment u/s 144, treated cash deposits of ₹10.86 lakh in bank accounts as unexplained u/s 69A. On appeal, CIT(A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930