Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

AO Quoted Non-Existent Section 147(a) -ITAT Quashes Reassessment

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jaivir Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2012-13
Advertisement
Jaivir Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO’s Reliance on Repealed Law Costs Revenue Dear – Reopening Without Application of Mind Invalid: Facts: No return originally filed for AY 2012-13. AO received information of cash deposits ₹17.40 lakh in Punjab National Bank during FY 2011-12. Notice u/s 148 issued (29.03.2019) with prior approval u/s 151. Assessee filed return on 29.10.2019, explained deposits as sale proceeds of agricultural land. AO rejected explanation, added ₹17.40 lakh u/s 69A as unexplained cash deposits; also added bank interest ₹44,782 & disallowed deduction u/s VIA. CIT(A...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,510

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *