This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Investment in residential plot qualifies for Section 54F deduction: ITAT Delhi
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Prem Raj singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Prem Raj singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Background and Assessee’s Claim
The assessee, Prem Raj Singh, sold an urban agricultural land for Rs. 1,38,55,220 and claimed a long-term capital gains exemption of Rs. 1,15,82,887 under Section 54F. This exemption was claimed on the grounds that the proceeds were invested in a residential plot. However, the Income Tax Officer (ITO) denied the exemption, arguing that Section 54F requires investment in a “residential house” and not just a plot of land. The ITO also contended that the assessee failed to deposit the unutilized capital gains int...




