Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Arcade Constructions Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Arcade Constructions Vs ITO (Karnataka High Court) Karnataka HC on Reopening: Opportunity of Hearing is a Must! -Quashes ₹9.10 Cr Ex-Parte Reassessment; Karnataka HC Quashes Ex-Parte Reassessment & Penalty Orders Against Arcade Constructions Karnataka High Court dealt with the validity of reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 148A(b) & concluded ex-parte against a partnership firm. Arcade Constructions, a partnership firm registered u/s 58(1) of the Partnership Act, had closed its business during the onset of the pandemic & had not filed its return for AY 2020-21. Dept issued n...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031