Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sivanand Madas Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sivanand Madas Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) Adjustment u/s 50C not a Prima Facie Issue- 50C cannot override Title & Valuation Disputes- AO must refer to DVO Assessee challenged addition of ₹20.81 crore made u/s 50C through processing of return u/s 143(1). Assessee filed return declaring ₹11.49 crore. CPC processed the return & adopted the stamp duty valuation (₹42.67 crore) instead of actual sale consideration (₹21.86 crore), resulting in total income of ₹32.31 crore & tax demand of ₹6.08 crore. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal, holding that since the stamp duty valuation was und...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930