Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Danaram Jivaram Choudhary (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Danaram Jivaram Choudhary (ITAT Ahmedabad) Reopening Based on Borrowed Satisfaction Held Invalid – ₹5.21 Crore Addition Deleted- ITAT Ahmedabad Ahmedabad ITAT has dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue in the case, upholding the order of CIT(A) which had quashed reopening & deleted addition of ₹5.21 crore made u/s 69A. Assessee had filed return of income declaring ₹23.53 lakh. Subsequently, AO received information from DDIT (Inv.), Ahmedabad pursuant to survey u/s 133A in the case of Mudra Finvest (Guj) Ltd. During survey, digital data in laptops & hard disks alleg...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031