Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Changappa Pemmaiah Biddamada Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Changappa Pemmaiah Biddamada Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) No Second Bite at the Cherry- ‘Set Aside’ u/s 264 means Assessment Quashed – AO cannot Redo without Fresh Directions Assessee faced an addition of ₹20.78 lakh towards cash deposits in his bank account. The original assessment was completed ex parte u/s 144 on 27.12.2019. Aggrieved, assessee filed a revision petition u/s 264. PCIT, by order dated 28.03.2021, set aside the assessment order with the observation that the assessee must regularly check the income-tax portal for departmental communications. Following this, however, AO onc...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930