Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Kamal Khetan Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Kamal Khetan Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Suspicion can’t replace Proof-  Banking & Demat records win the day-Penny Stock additions deleted –   No direct evidence linking assessee to price manipulation in shares – Modus operandi  spelt by itself is not an adequate ground to impeach the  transactions- ITAT Mumbai Mumbai ITAT quashed additions made on alleged bogus Long-Term Capital Gains (LTCG) from penny stock transactions, holding that in the absence of specific incriminating material linking Assessee to any accommodation entry provider or price rigging activity, the claim of ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930