This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Failure to file return u/s. 139(1) doesn’t constitute under-reporting within section 270A(2)(b): Penalty deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ishit Kamleshbhai Sheth Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2018-19
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Ishit Kamleshbhai Sheth Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad held that mere filing of return in response to notice u/s. 148 does not ipso facto justify the invocation of section 270A(2)(b), unless there is a demonstrable act of under-reporting in substance. Thus, penalty deleted as failure to furnish return u/s. 139(1) doesn’t constitute under-reporting.
Facts- The assessee is an individual deriving income from salary and other sources, primarily from employment with M/s Tech Mahindra Ltd. for the relevant financial year. This appeal has been preferred by the assessee agai...




