Case Law Details
Case Name : Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Nalinkant Shyamshanker Pandya Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Assessee did not file his return of income for AY 2012-13. AO had received an information that the assessee had made cash deposit of Rs.14,01,000/- in his bank a/c . In addition, there were non-cash deposits of Rs.3,39,450/- in the said bank a/c. On the basis of this information, AO had recorded his reason u/s.147 & notice u/s148 was issued but no return was filed in response to the notice . However, Assessee had replied through e-mail to the SCN of AO & given explanation regarding the cash deposits. AO considered the ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

