Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dhiren Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dhiren Ramanlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai has ruled in the case of Dhiren Ramanlal Shah vs. ITO, allowing an individual partner to carry forward losses and get relief from late fees. The ruling hinges on the fact that the partner’s firm had to file an audit report, extending the partner’s own filing deadline. In a recent ruling, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) in Mumbai has sided with a taxpayer, Dhiren Ramanlal Shah, allowing him to carry forward a capital loss and directing the deletion of a late filing fee. The case revolved around the interpretation of the due ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930