Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Parasmal Ravindra Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Parasmal Ravindra Kumar Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Individual assessee along with two of his family members sold 2.74 acres of vacant land at   Padarvadi Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk. During scrutiny assessee claimed the capital gains on the transfer of asset as exempt u/s 2(14). Before the AO, assessee filed copy of adangal issued by the Village Administrative Officer  (VAO), Pathervadi Village. According to the AO, though the lands are classified as Punja lands in revenue records as per the Adangal register of the village, held the impugned lands are Banjar lands & there is no reference of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031