This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Estimation-based additions not justify Section 271(1)(c) Penalty: ITAT Rajkot
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Anil Abhubhai Odedara Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Rajkot
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Anil Abhubhai Odedara Vs ITO (ITAT Rajkot)
In the case of Anil Abhubhai Odedara vs. Income Tax Officer, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Rajkot ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14. The penalty was based on an addition of ₹5,15,899 made by the Assessing Officer (AO) during the assessment proceedings, derived from an estimated profit of 8% on total contract receipts. The assessee argued that since the addition was based on estimation rather than concrete evidence or documentation ...




