This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Retrospective Amendment Doesn’t Justify Reassessment Beyond Four Years
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Oxford University Press Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Oxford University Press Vs DCIT (Bombay High Court)
Bombay High Court quashed the income tax reassessment proceedings initiated against Oxford University Press (OUP) for the assessment year 2014-15. The reassessment notice was issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, beyond the four-year limitation period. The court ruled that the conditions for reopening the assessment were not met, as there was no failure on the part of OUP to fully and truly disclose material facts. The department had sought to reassess OUP based on a later classification as a “non-resident” entity ...
