Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Company Law

Order not falling under part II of IBC is not appealable u/s. 61: NCLAT Chennai

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 390
Case Name
Renuka Devi Rangaswamy Vs State Bank of India (NCLAT Chennai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Courts
NCLAT
Advertisement

Renuka Devi Rangaswamy Vs State Bank of India (NCLAT Chennai)

NCLAT Chennai held that order not falling under Part II of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 [IBC] is not appealable under section 61 of the IBC and accordingly appeal dismissed as not maintainable.

Facts- Resolution professional of Regen Powertech Private Limited (RPPL) & Regen Infrastructure And Services Private Limited has filed the present appeal. The basic argument of the Counsel for the appellant would be confined to the directives, which have been given by the Ld. Adjudicating Authority by referring the matter to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, (IBBI) as against the present appellant for seeking an appropriate and necessary action.

Conclusion- Held that, as far as the specific mandate of the law, the appeal under Section 61 will not lie as against the order and the nature of the order, which is under challenge in the absence of the same being falling under Part II of the I & B Code, where reference of disciplinary action against the resolution professional is directed to be taken by the IBBI itself, since not being an order falling under Part II of the I & B Code, the same would not be appealable.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.