Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Discharge of burden u/s. 68 involves question of fact and not substantial question of law

Case Law Details

Case Name
CIT Vs Goldstone Cements Limited (Gauhati High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement CIT Vs Goldstone Cements Limited (Gauhati High Court) Gauhati High Court held that discharge of burden by assessee under section 68 of the Income Tax Act i.e. identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction is question of fact and not substantial question of law. Accordingly, appeal is not maintainable. Facts- Upon a search and seizure as per Section 132 of the IT Act being conducted in the office premises of the respondent company as well as in the residence of family members and other business concerns etc., the Assessing Authority having doubted the sale transacti...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *