Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) untenable without concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars

Case Law Details

Case Name
Amitabha Sanyal Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2011-12
Advertisement
Amitabha Sanyal Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata held that imposition of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act untenable without concealment of particulars of income or for furnishing of inaccurate particulars. Accordingly, penalty deleted. Facts- Vide the present appeal, the appellant has mainly contested the imposition of penalty of ₹4,56,362/-, being without jurisdiction, illegal and invalid, bad in law, without recording proper satisfaction within the meaning of Section 271 of the Act and without appreciating that the amount of ₹22,95,849/-arising in the hands of the assessee ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *