This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition u/s. 2(22)(e) deleted as advance was recorded as journal entry and no sum was received
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Ramesh Nagindas Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Ramesh Nagindas Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
ITAT Ahmedabad held that addition u/s. 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act is liable to be set aside since advance was received was merely recorded as journal entry and no sum was received by the assessee. Thus, appeal allowed.
Facts- During the course of assessment proceedings, AO observed that the assessee was a director and substantial shareholder in M/s. Mahavir Submersible Pvt. Ltd., holding 49.71% of the total shares amounting to ₹35,00,000/-. AO noted that the assessee had received a loan of ₹65,22,947/- from the aforesaid company and observed...






