Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

No section 271D penalty for Cash receipt if reasonable cause exist

Case Law Details

Case Name
Laxmilal Badolla Vs NFAC (ITAT Bangalore)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2016-17
Advertisement Laxmilal Badolla Vs NFAC (ITAT Bangalore) In the case of Laxmilal Badolla vs. NFAC (ITAT Bangalore), the issue revolved around the imposition of penalty under Section 271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning cash receipts during the assessment year 2016-17. Here’s a detailed summary of the judgment delivered by the ITAT Bangalore: Background: Laxmilal Badolla, an individual, had sold two properties during the relevant year and received a total of Rs. 8,39,000/- in cash from the buyers. The Income Tax Department initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271D against him...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Sandeep Kanoi
Qualification: CA in Job / Business
Company: Taxguru Consultancy
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Articles Published: 18,775

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *