Tristar Logistics Vs State Tax Officer (Madras High Court)
In the case of Tristar Logistics vs. State Tax Officer, the petitioner challenged an order dated 06.10.2023, which was issued without their knowledge until their bank, Standard Chartered Bank, notified them about it. The petitioner filed a writ petition on these grounds, asserting their inability to respond to the show cause notice or attend the personal hearing due to being unaware of the proceedings. They argued that while the notice and order were uploaded on the portal, they were not communicated through any other means. Furthermore, the petitioner’s bank account was attached, and the entire liability under the order, including tax and penalty, was appropriated from their bank account.
The learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the petitioner was not aware of the proceedings, including the show cause notice and personal hearing, and therefore could not participate in the process. On the other hand, Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate representing respondents 1 & 2, accepted notice and pointed out that the intimation was issued to the petitioner in August 2023, with the show cause notice being issued on 16.08.2023. He also mentioned that a personal hearing was provided in September 2023 before the impugned order was issued.
