Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A J.P Morgan Tower Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A J.P Morgan Tower Vs CIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai held that assessment order passed without satisfying mandatory provisions of section 92CA and CBDT instruction no. 3 of 2016 is order falling within the meaning of erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. Hence, revisional jurisdiction u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act rightly invoked. Facts- The present appeal is preferred by the assessee contesting invocation of revisional jurisdiction. It is alleged that the CIT has invoked revisional jurisdiction primarily on the ground that AO was mandatorily required to ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930