This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 276C(2): Prosecution for Wilful Tax Evasion, Not for Tax Non-payment
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Unique Trading Company Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2010-11
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Unique Trading Company Vs ITO (Bombay High Court)
The distinction between a willful attempt to evade tax and mere failure to pay the tax is a nuanced yet critical aspect of tax law, particularly under the provisions of Section 276C(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the IT Act, 1961). This analysis delves into the legal interpretations and judicial precedents surrounding prosecutions under this section, emphasizing the necessity for a willful attempt to evade tax as opposed to mere non-payment.
Legal Framework and Judicial Interpretation: Section 276C(2) of the IT Act, 1961, pre...
Author Info
