Introduction: In a conversation between fictional characters Arjuna and Krishna, the discussion revolves around the significant issues faced by taxpayers due to TDS defaults linked to inoperative PANs. The challenges outlined shed light on the harsh impact on taxpayers and the practical difficulties faced by deductors.
Arjuna (Fictional Character): Krishna, The TDS defaults on account of Inoperative PANs have created a lot of issues among the taxpayers. What are some major issues faced by them?
Krishna (Fictional Character): Arjuna, Some of the major issues faced by the taxpayers for due to inoperative PANs, are as under:
1. The original rate of TDS under the act are 1%, 2% 5% and 10% however for inoperative PANs the higher rate of TDS applicable is 20% for all transactions irrespective of the original rate. Thus Contractors whose TDS was to be originally deducted by 1% is now being deducted @ 20% which is harsh on the taxpayers.
2. The deductors are asked to discharge the difference amount in TDS along with interest @ 1 percent from month of deduction till the date of payment, which affects their operating cash flows.
3. Primarily in case of One Time Transactions it is difficult for the deductors to recover such amount from the deductees.
4. Even after subsequent linking of PAN with Aadhar within the same financial year, the deductors are required to discharge the liability at higher rate and revise their return.
5. The department expects the deductors to check PANs of each and every deductees as on the date of deduction, which is practically not feasible and is against the ease of doing business.
Arjuna (Fictional Character): Krishna, what shall the deductors do presently on receipt of such notices?
Krishna (Fictional Character): Arjuna, the following are the ways the deductors can resolve the issues relating to TDS defaults:
1. The Deductors shall first focus on discharging the tax liability raised as delay in resolving the issues would result in increase in the outstanding interest liability.
2. The deductors shall debit the deductees with such difference amount, where such amount is recoverable and shall legally recover the amount from the deductees.
3. For existing deductees, the deductors shall verify the PANs of all the vendors as a single time activity through TRACES and deduct TDS for all inoperative PANs at higher rate henceforth.
4. For new deductees, the deductors shall verify the PAN status as on the time of Vendor Registration itself.
5. It’s a revenue neutral activity and if the Income Tax Returns have been regularly filed by the deductees, even the Delhi High Court has ruled in favour of deductor in case of such lower deduction.
6. The deductors who are in disagreement with the notices can adopt the path of litigation to resolve their issues.
Arjuna (Fictional Character): Krishna, What are the probable solutions that can be implemented for resolving such issues?
Krishna (Fictional Character): Arjuna, The following are the probable steps that the revenue authorities can take to avoid the hardships faced by the taxpayers:
1. If the PAN is linked with Aadhar in the same financial year, the acknowledgment of such compliance shall be sufficient compliance of law and all the defaults shall be resolved.
2. Lower rates shall be prescribed for higher rate of deduction based on the existing original rates of TDS.
3. An utility or methodology shall be issued for deductors to verify the PAN status of all their deductees with ease.
Arjuna (Fictional Character): Krishna, what should one learn from this?
Krishna (Fictional Character): Arjuna, this step by government to punish the PAN defaulters is to reduce the number of duplicate PAN holders in the country. However, this step seems harsh on the deductors as they are now tasked with recovering such amount from the deductees and to pay such amount along with interest, which is a difficult task considering the nature of some transaction. Further, even after subsequent rectification of mistake by the deductee, higher rate of TDS is applicable which is again harsh on the taxpayers.
During Q3 return Pan valid and operative tha but short deduction notice aya hai
JR me inoperative dikha raha hai
Pz help
This is a foolish rule by income tax , there are so many flaws and IT system is not prepared for these conditions.
I HAVE DEDUCTED TDS AS PER NORMAL RATE, BUT RECEIVED DEMAND NOTICE U/S 200A DUE TO INOPERATIVE PAN, DEDUCTEE UPDATED THEIR PAN AFTER RECEIPT OF THIS NOTICE, NOW THIS DEMAND NOTICE APPLICABLE TO US OR NOT?
I got 200A notice with reason sellers PAN was inoperative. But my argument is that notice was generated, as IT portal was non compliant with the rule introduced.
Issues in filing TDS process and portal:
1. The process on how to file 26QB doesn’t mention critical step of checking PAN operative status. This is one of the main reasons why buyers got notices.
https://incometaxindia.gov.in/Pages/tds-sale-of-immovable-property.aspx
2. PAN-Aadhaar were showing linked on income tax portal, but we still got the notice. Seems break in communication between Traces and Income-tax website.
3. While filing the details in form 26QB, the IT portal is not flagging the operational status of Seller’s PAN and the buyers are not warned about higher TDS deductions.
4. Sending notice after 10 days doesn’t make any sense, as by that time deal is already closed and there is no chance for buyer to deduct higher TDS.
IT dept is not giving any ans to above questions and avoiding it. We have tried reaching them by all means, but in vain.
Kindly advise.
Regards,
Yeshupal
I am one such buyer facing default notice. It could have easily been avoided if the IT system from where i paid 1% tax had either warned me of higher TDS if seller’s PAN ADHAAR are unlinked or it checked the status and not accepted 1%. By default the percentage for unlinked status should have been 20% in the system.
This is a heavy financial burden that has befallen upon taxpayer due to poor IT (software) system.
Really liking the Heading of the Article.Very Well Thought..
Thanks for informative article