Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Brand names being intangible assets are amenable to depreciation u/s 32(1)(ii)

Case Law Details

Case Name
PCIT Vs Kuantum Papers Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement PCIT Vs Kuantum Papers Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Delhi High Court held that ‘brand names’ falls within the scope of intangible assets and, accordingly, are amenable to deprecation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act. Facts- Two issues arise for consideration, in the present appeal, is that whether the respondent/assessee has rightly claimed depreciation amounting to Rs.7,44,36,019/- concerning the chemical recovery plant and whether the claim for depreciation on the brands used by the respondent/assessee, concerning its paper manufacturing business, were intangible...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *