This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Any mark being deceptively similar in respect of identical or similar goods would be contrary to S. 11 of Trademark Act
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- GM Modular PVT LTD Vs Gopal Shinghal & ANR (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
GM Modular PVT LTD Vs Gopal Shinghal & ANR (Delhi High Court)
Conclusion: The Hon’ble High Court while allowing the Petition observed that a trademark being deceptively similar would be hit under Section 11(1)(b) of the Trademark Act, 1999 which prohibits registration of a mark deceptively similar to a mark which is already on the register in respect of identical or similar goods.
Facts: In present facts of the case, the Petitioner has filed the petition seeking cancellation of trademark ‘GMT’ bearing registration in class 9. The case of the Petitioner is that it is ...
Author Info
