Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Excise Duty

Invocation of extended period of limitation in absence of intention to evade duty is unsustainable

Case Law Details

Case Name
Pawan Kumar Sharma Vs Commissioner (Meghalaya High Court)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement
Pawan Kumar Sharma Vs Commissioner (Meghalaya High Court) Meghalaya High Court held that extended period of limitation as per proviso to section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 not invocable as there was no element of deceit or intention on the part of the assessee to evade duty. Facts- The assessee is in appeal upon duty, interest and penalty being levied on the assessee for non-payment or short payment of duty for a period more than one year prior to the date of issuance of the show-cause notice. Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, of 1944 provided for a period of limitation of one...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *