This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Rejection of bid for not meeting qualification criteria doesn’t warrant interference of court under Article 226
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Kalinga Commercial Corporation Ltd Vs Steel Authority of India (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Kalinga Commercial Corporation Ltd Vs Steel Authority of India (Delhi High Court)
Delhi High Court held that rejection of bid of the petitioner by SAIL for not meeting the qualification criteria is not arbitrary and hence interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India unwarranted.
Facts- The Respondent (Steel Authority of India) floated the Impugned Tender on 02.07.2022 for engagement of Mine Developer-cum-Operator (MDO) for Development & Operation of Mines at Taldih (7.0 Mtpa ROM feed) along with installation of 10 Mtpa Loading facility at Barsua Valley.
The Pet...
Author Info
