Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Godrej Agrovet Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 86510 of 2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/05/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Godrej Agrovet Ltd Vs Commissioner of CGST (CESTAT Mumbai)

CESTAT Mumbai held that products Zymegold Plus and Dripzyme are classifiable under CTH 3101 as Fertilizer and not as Plant Growth Regulator.

Facts- The issue involved herein is whether the products Zymegold Plus and Dripzyme are classifiable under CTH 3808 – ‘Plant Growth Regulator’ as re-classified by the department or under CTH 3101 – ‘Fertilizer’ as claimed by the Appellant?

Conclusion- There is a difference between fertilizer and plant growth regulator. A fertilizer will promote growth of the plant by providing nutritional support and will not inhibit it, whereas a Plant Growth Regulator stimulates plant growth without providing any nutrition to the plants. It’s like a tonic which promotes/inhibits the growth by affecting the structure at the physiological level.

In fact plants cannot survive without essential nutrient elements supplied from fertilizers or from organic and inorganic chemical in the soil. Undisputedly, for an item to be classified as fertilizer under Chapter 31, presence of any one or more of the N,P,K (i.e. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) as essential constituent is a sine qua non.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031