This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Jurisdiction to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) fails for non-application of mind by AO
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Dinesh Sitaram Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Dinesh Sitaram Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
We note that, while culminating the reassessment proceeding in the case of the assessee, the Ld. AO vide concluding para placed at page 4 of his order communicated the assessee his action of initiating the penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of Act for ‘under reporting / mis-reporting’ of income however by the impugned order has ended up levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for ‘furnishing inaccurate particulars of income’, which found perfunctory sustained by the Ld. CIT(A).
Undisputedly in the present case before us, the Ld. AO in the course of reassess...







one party has been imposed penalty U/S 271(1)(c) as well as 271F after completion of face to face assessment for the AY 2015-16 and got assessment order in favor on 11-10-2022. Further he received show cause notice on 25-02-2023 for penalty US 271(a)(c) and 271F. Party has sent reply properly in faceless manner within due date. Again he received penalty order, computation sheets and Demand notice u/s as above to pay both.please advise if any remedies on it.